Cheap Uggs Online Outlet Online - Discount Ugg Boots On Sale - CORYPHAEUS.COM
Holiest websites in Islam
Holiest websites in Islam is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to take part, you can edit the post attached to this web page, or go to the project web page, exactly where you can be a part of the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This post is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam related posts on Wikipedia. If you would like to take part, make sure you go to the venture page, where you can join the discussion and see a checklist of open duties.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Make sure you do not modify it. Subsequent feedback ought to be made in a new segment on the talk web page. No additional edits ought to be produced to this segment.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. tariqabjotu 22:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Third holiest website in Islam (expression) Third holiest website in Islam This was outlined at WP:RM under "Uncontroversial proposals" by Consumer:Valley2city with the explanation: "I was told to repost this once the AfD was more than. The AfD for this web page has unsuccessful 3 occasions. Meanwhile somebody has, with out dialogue, moved this web page from Third holiest site in Islam to Third holiest site in Islam (expression). I ask that you move it back again without further dialogue simply because the original louis vuitton bags on line sale web page transfer ought to not have been unilaterally done. At minimum allow it be discussed before changing a controversial topic from its authentic web page. Shifting it to its original would therefore be uncontroversial." Alas, it appears not to be uncontroversial, as an oppose (copied below) was instantly lodged. Thus, I moved the request handbagsoutletuk to the ordinary, non uncontroversial section, and I am adding this survey here. I abstain. GTBacchus(speak) twenty:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Add " Support" or " Oppose" adopted by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with
Oppose Wikipedia can't say what is or is not a holy site. Whilst a redirect of the shorter title to the lengthier title seems alright to me, the real post title becoming appended with "(expression)" is a Good Factor, because it clearly describes in a glance that Wikipedia replica designer handbags uk has no viewpoint on holiness and that the article is about the phrase and the location the phrase refers to, not about the holiness of the website, for each se. SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] twenty:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Oppose for each SMcCandlish. (Netscott) twenty:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment I copied the over two recommendations from WP:RM, which is why their time stamps indicate they had been solid prior to the study was initiated. GTBacchus(speak) twenty:forty one, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Assistance For each my nomination (if it wasn't distinct before). Valley2city 03:forty eight, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Oppose: Nevertheless I assistance following two title modifications outlined beneath by me. ALM eleven:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Assistance These websites have all been called the "third holiest". The word "expression" is extremely misleading. "Third holiest" is a designation of the site, not an "expression". There is also no "controversy" that there are various websites that have been given the exact same status is the purpose this article was created. It makes no distinction whether or not or not these are from Muslim resources, the reality that they are all WP:RS is what matters. This is not MuslimWikipedia. Chesdovi 12:forty six, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
But this post is about ISLAM and should signify what Muslims see on 3rd holiest. Not what towards large Muslim majority view and some western media web site think. It should not be what non Muslim as 3rd holiest to us/Muslims. If you want to maintain it then change it title appropriately. ALM 15:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
The initial entry represents what the "majority" of Muslims view as third holiest. Non Muslims also reside on this planet and are entitled to their views, no doubt collected from Muslim sources in the initial place! Chesdovi 15:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for accepting it. I wish other customers can see what you have stated over and know the situation. This is Uggs online the biggest reason to delete or change it Yacky title. ALM 15:forty one, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Oppose. This is original study. There is no this kind of debate in Islam about the 3rd Holiest website. This article does not mention that. Also, this post is mainly utilizing erroneous reportings and therefore is a total untrue. The argument of if some thing is holy or not is not evaluated this way. Almaqdisi talk to me 00:forty four, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Oppose POV + per as written by SMcCandlish. Also because of to the soapbox intentions as demonstrated by particular users. thestick 14:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Oppose. If the article had been about the website which is the 3rd holiest in Islam, then, by consensus of Islamic students, it should be a redirect to Al Aqsa. If the article is to have any content that is appropriate for Wikipedia, that content material can only be about the dispute between Islamic students who claim that Al Aqsa is third holiest, and some non Islamic sources who wish to contest that idea. BostonMA speak 14:fifty one, 29 Uggs online November 2006 (UTC)
Oppose. Some individuals like to intitate some authentic study right here. Almaqdisi speak to me 11:35, four December 2006 (UTC)Arrived more than from the WP:RM entry. I agree that the phrase "expression" in the title is inappropriate. If there had been numerous utilizes of the phrase, then the main form could be a disambiguation web page, but that does not seem to be the situation here. To inform the truth, following studying the page, the suitable title appears like it should be "Third holiest site in Islam controversy" as there appears to be numerous contenders for the title. StuffOfInterest twenty:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
There is no controversy. That is the issue. (Netscott) twenty:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
If that is the
about parajumpers case then this post should only exist as a redirect to Al Aqsa Mosque. StuffOfInterest twenty:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)